Court NewsThe day's top news and pictures from London's courts.
 
SEVEN DEADLY MOTIVES FOR MURDER - READ THE EXCLUSIVE STORY BEHIND THE KILLING OF SPECIAL CONSTABLE NISHA PATEL IN THE CRIME VAULT...nurse left man in agony with sores on his testicles...pair face retrial after claims they beat a Muslim traffic warden unconscious for ticketing a car at dead soldier's wake... play scheme worker groomed girl for sex for years...vigilante gang stabbed father-of-six to death in 'revenge' for assault on brother...
  Home  Registered Users  News and Photo Gallery  Picture Archive  Crime Vaults  CourtNewsUK Service  Video Vaults  Online archive  Contact 
Sample Report

To show the depth of a full report, we show below:

  • a headline report from the News and Photo Gallery Page, and the typical thumbnail photo images we use on that page
  • a copy of the full report we would supply to you
Sample Headline Report

Sherrington: "Witch" widow Appeal Court fight
NORTH LONDON


Sample Full Report

Widowed Yvonne Sherrington, branded "a witch"  after losing out in a venomous will dispute with her three step-children, was today battling to restore her good name - and multi-million-pound inheritance.

Mrs Sherrington was left with her reputation in tatters last year when High Court judge, Mr Justice Lightman, castigated her as "aggressive", "intolerant" and "unable to come to terms with the unpalatable facts" .

The judge said her multi-millionaire solicitor husband, Richard Sherrington, had himself described her to friends as "Hitler" and "a witch" and his marriage as "the biggest mistake of my life" before his death in an October 2001 road smash.

Mr Sherrington died just seven weeks after signing the will which left everything to Yvonne and nothing to his three children by his first, 28-year, marriage, Dahlia, 30, Donna, 27, and Ramon, 21, who was just 18 when his father lost his life on the M25. In July last year, Mr Justice Lightman handed the children back their inheritance when he ruled the September 2001 will had neither been properly witnessed nor did it express their wealthy father's true wishes.

But that ruling today came under fierce attack at London's Appeal Court by Yvonne Sherrington's QC, Alan Boyle, who described the judge's decision as "absurd" and "contrary to all reasonable probability".

Describing Mr Justice Lightman's findings as "extraordinary", Mr Boyle said the will had been "duly executed" on its face and it was "simply unbelievable" and "inconceivable" that Mr Sherrington, a highly successful solicitor of 30 years' experience, would have signed it on each of its three pages without even having read it.

The briefest glance at the will's first page would have revealed the nature of the will and the possibility that Mr Sherrington did not know and approve of its contents was "so unlikely it ought not to be treated as a real one", he told Lord Justice Peter Gibson, Lord Justice Waller and Lord Justice Neuberger.

Mr Sherrington could quite rationally have concluded that his children would be adequately provided for under a pension fund and insurance policies and Mr Boyle argued there was nothing "suspicious" about the will which should have shifted the burden of proving its validity onto his widow.

However, in defending Mr Justice Lightman's ruling, the children's barrister, Elspeth Talbot Rice, pointed to the judge's words that Mr Sherrington was "in every way a family man", a man of honour who was devoted to his children despite their poor relations with his second wife.

His generosity to his offspring was "boundless" - he had remained on good terms with his first wife and his children's mother, Gloria - and the will had been greeted with universal shock by his friends and family.

Although Mr Sherrington had qualified draftsmen aplenty available to him in his own law firm, the will, said Miss Talbot Rice, had been drafted by Yvonne Sherrington's daughter, Dr Nathalie Walker, who was a "complete novice" in legal matters and whose qualifications were in plant ecology.

Arguing there was more than enough evidence to raise the judge's suspicions, the barrister said the will was said to have been witnessed by an office cleaner - whose native tongue is Gujarati and who spoke "painfully poor" English - and the wife of Mr Sherrington chauffeur.

Miss Talbot Rice said Mr Justice Lightman had been right to find Yvonne Sherrington an "unsatisfactory and unreliable witness" who was "quite unable to come to terms with the unpalatable facts and willing to say anything that comes to mind, irrespective of its truth, to contradict them."

The judge had also said of the widow: "She showed herself to be aggressive, intolerant, ready without any basis to charge anyone who gave evidence adverse to her cause with deliberate lying".

And Miss Talbot Rice told the Appeal Court there could be no viable challenge to Mr Justice Lightman's findings of fact and assessment of the evidence which he was entitled to reach.

Mr Sherrington founded the leading north London law firm which bears his name and also owned a loan business, Barex Brokers Ltd, whose loan book was valued at €8 million after his death. On top of that he had assets worth at least €1.5 million when he died in a collision with a lorry, aged just 56.

His children argued the will - signed on September 7 2001 just as their father was about to leave on holiday - as "suspicious".

But Mr Boyle told the Appeal Court some of Mr Justice Lightman's findings against the widow were "simply wrong and grossly unfair". He and his second wife had signed reciprocal wills, leaving everything to each other, and there was nothing unusual about that, he argued.

Yvonne Sherrington had suffered "great upset" at the judge's suggestion that their marriage was on the rocks when her husband died and Mr Boyle argued the judge had let his "extreme findings" on that issue "distort" his views on the validity of the will.

The Appeal Court hearing is expected to last three days.

ends


Sample Headline Report
"Teacher cleared of sexual assault charges"

A teacher has been cleared by a jury of sexually assaulting a love-sick 14-year-old pupil.

Anthony Roberts, 25, was said to have used the teenager for his own 'sexual gratification' after telling her he loved her.

Prosecutors claimed he put his hands under her uniform in the school chapel, theatre and photocopying room.

But Roberts told how the girl had a crush on him and had fanticised about having sex at the school in Kenton, Middlesex.

The jury at Harrow Crown Court took three and a half hours to unanimously acquit Roberts of four counts of indecent assault and one count of gross indecency with a child.

The married father-of-two, born and raised in Gateshead, was cleared of engaging in sexual activity with a person under the age of 16 while in a position of trust earlier in the trial.

Roberts, of (37) Grove End Road, St John's Wood, north west London, denied the charges.

After the verdicts were announced he rushed over to his sobbing wife Goldy and she said 'thank you, thank you' to members of the jury.

His solicitor John Perry said in a statement: 'The last 15 months or so have been a complete nightmare but it is now over.

'He hopes it will not be too far in the future when he will be able to resume his vocation of teaching.'

Roberts had vehemently denied any sexual misbehaviour with the girl and insisted the allegations she made were 'all going on in her head.'

He agreed to give the troubled student personal tuition but he backed away when a colleague advised him to keep his distance.

But as rumours abounded among the school's 2000 student population that he was having an affair with the girl he dismissed them as 'silly teenage nonsense.'

Home |  Registered Users |  News and Photo Gallery |  Picture Archive |  Crime Vaults |  CourtNewsUK Service |  Video Vaults |  Online archive |  Contact